The Sacred House of Eden

The Sacred House of Eden scores a 7.9—same tier as a 14-day Ayurveda program in India and a psilocybin retreat with integration support. That's the first thing to know. The second thing: the data here is incomplete. Room count is zero, pricing shows $0–$0, and location is unlisted. This isn't a red flag so much as a transparency problem. What we can measure looks solid. Amenities and food quality both hit 10.0. The retreat documents vegetarian, vegan, gluten-free, and Ayurvedic options—actually itemized rather than promised. Google reviews sit at 5/5 across 51 submissions, which is the kind of consistency that's either real or really well-managed. Either way, guests aren't complaining.

The fitness and recovery scores (8.8 and 8.4) suggest a program that takes movement seriously, not just yoga-as-filler. Spa and relaxation landed 8.3. Where things soften: education and workshops, activities, and mindfulness all scored 7.0. These aren't weak, but they're not differentiators. Medical and clinical programming is especially low at 5.2—this isn't a medically supervised detox or clinical-grade treatment center. If you need that, look elsewhere. The ease-of-travel score (6.0) reflects the location mystery; you can't plan logistics around unknown geography. Add-ons and personalization also came in at 7.0, suggesting limited flexibility for customization or extension.

Book this if you want solid plant-medicine work in an environment with excellent food and real recovery infrastructure. The 51-review consensus is hard to ignore. But if you need transparent pricing, specific location details, or clinical oversight, the retreat's current listing doesn't deliver that information. Compare directly: competing retreats at the same 7.9 score offer 14-day programs starting at $76/night or psilocybin-specific protocols. Before committing, request a detailed itinerary, exact location, and per-night breakdown. The reviews suggest the experience justifies it. The listing just doesn't make the case yet.